Back to Trevor McFedries
Context preview

Atoms vs Bits

A limited preview of the context Palate can cite when answering questions from Trevor McFedries.

User uploadsPublic source
Document preview
Author
Citrini
Published
Feb 11, 2026

Introduction Capital is rotating out of bits and into atoms. Software companies, the darlings of the last decade, are being forced to answer a question they’ve never had to answer before: what happens to your 30x revenue multiple when new technology poses a potentially existential threat? See, for many of these companies, valuations were so high and such sustained growth was priced in that agentic AI didn’t even need to actually impact the business. The threat of a threat was enough to reprice them. Into this software selloff, anything that wasn’t nailed down was thrown overboard.

Vertical SaaS, digital advertising platforms, portions of fintech, all suddenly trading at discounts to their historical ranges as the market begins to assign what I’d call an “AI Disruption Discount”. Does your high switching cost or sticky UX matter in the AI era? Don’t know? Okay - trade lower until you do. Will agentic commerce threaten your marketplace? Maybe? Okay, well, you’re worth 30% less. The logic is ruthless and correct: none of us really know what AI will look like in a few years, and the technology is advancing at a rate that has us asking if the singularity actually just got penciled in for next Thursday.

Agentic AI was a talking point for investors, but once Anthropic et al. shoved it in their face they had to reconcile with some hard potential realities that didn’t align with their portfolio. We could spend a lot of time debating what moats will endure in software – do we just sell anything you click and buy the dip in the APIs? Is this just empowering new entrants to challenge incumbents or will enterprises bring entire software workflows in house via AI? The more you think about it, the more you realize that without a crystal ball you’ve got a lot more questions than answers.

That’s why I think investors will opt for a simpler outlook - what can’t you prompt your way out of? The answer to this question leads you to a simple conclusion: Atoms have become more valuable relative to bits. As hyperscalers exponentially ramp up their bit-generation capabilities, their demand for power and materials has moved in lockstep. Virtually every single bottleneck or constraint surrounding the AI trade has been in the real world. Claude, increase the global supply of Titanium by 5% above forecasts this year… See. That still doesn’t work. Not even on Opus 4.6 Fast.

A lot of the “real world” beneficiaries that investors have piled into so far, however, are the obvious ones. Power generation equipment. Optical Interconnects. Grid infrastructure. Copper miners. Nuclear. Don’t get me wrong - these were great calls (many of them were ours), but they are all relatively crowded trades now. Many are priced for the perfection that physical world constraints ironically make impossible to deliver. So where do we go from here? The next evolution of the “atoms” trade is where new sources of demand collide with the existing data center buildout to constrain supply chains even further.

A poster child of this collision is in jet engines.

Open original